84 lines
3.0 KiB
Diff
84 lines
3.0 KiB
Diff
|
From 218e958524c673d6e68737e7f82d80ba2b6ef59a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||
|
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
|
||
|
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 14:40:07 +0200
|
||
|
Subject: drivers/firmware: skip simpledrm if nvidia-drm.modeset=1 is set
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Nvidia proprietary driver has some bugs that leads to issues if used
|
||
|
with the simpledrm driver. The most noticeable is that does not register
|
||
|
an emulated fbdev device.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It just relies on a fbdev to be registered by another driver, that could
|
||
|
be that could be attached to the framebuffer console. On UEFI machines,
|
||
|
this is the efifb driver.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This means that disabling the efifb driver will cause virtual consoles to
|
||
|
not be present in the system when using the Nvidia driver. Legacy BIOS is
|
||
|
not affected just because fbcon is not used there, but instead vgacon.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Unless a VGA mode is specified using the vga= kernel command line option,
|
||
|
in that case the vesafb driver is used instead and its fbdev attached to
|
||
|
the fbcon.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is a problem because with CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB=y, the sysfb platform
|
||
|
code attempts to register a "simple-framebuffer" platform device (that is
|
||
|
matched against simpledrm) and only registers either an "efi-framebuffer"
|
||
|
or "vesa-framebuffer" if this fails to be registered due the video modes
|
||
|
not being compatible.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Nvidia driver relying on another driver to register the fbdev is quite
|
||
|
fragile, since it can't really assume those will stick around. For example
|
||
|
there are patches posted to remove the EFI and VESA platform devices once
|
||
|
a real DRM or fbdev driver probes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
But in any case, moving to a simpledrm + emulated fbdev only breaks this
|
||
|
assumption and causes users to not have VT if the Nvidia driver is used.
|
||
|
|
||
|
So to prevent this, let's add a workaround and make the sysfb to skip the
|
||
|
"simple-framebuffer" registration when nvidia-drm.modeset=1 option is set.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is quite horrible, but honestly I can't think of any other approach.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For this to work, the CONFIG_FB_EFI and CONFIG_FB_VESA config options must
|
||
|
be enabled besides CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
|
||
|
Cherry-picked-for: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/73720
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
drivers/firmware/sysfb.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
|
||
|
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
|
||
|
|
||
|
--- a/drivers/firmware/sysfb.c
|
||
|
+++ b/drivers/firmware/sysfb.c
|
||
|
@@ -35,6 +35,22 @@
|
||
|
#include <linux/screen_info.h>
|
||
|
#include <linux/sysfb.h>
|
||
|
|
||
|
+static int skip_simpledrm;
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
+static int __init simpledrm_disable(char *opt)
|
||
|
+{
|
||
|
+ if (!opt)
|
||
|
+ return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
+ get_option(&opt, &skip_simpledrm);
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
+ if (skip_simpledrm)
|
||
|
+ pr_info("The simpledrm driver will not be probed\n");
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
+ return 0;
|
||
|
+}
|
||
|
+early_param("nvidia-drm.modeset", simpledrm_disable);
|
||
|
+
|
||
|
static struct platform_device *pd;
|
||
|
static DEFINE_MUTEX(disable_lock);
|
||
|
static bool disabled;
|
||
|
@@ -145,7 +161,7 @@ static __init int sysfb_init(void)
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* try to create a simple-framebuffer device */
|
||
|
compatible = sysfb_parse_mode(si, &mode);
|
||
|
- if (compatible) {
|
||
|
+ if (compatible && !skip_simpledrm) {
|
||
|
pd = sysfb_create_simplefb(si, &mode, parent);
|
||
|
if (!IS_ERR(pd))
|
||
|
goto put_device;
|