From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:39:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] locking/rt: Remove one __cond_lock() in RT's
 spin_trylock_irqsave()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.11/older/patches-6.11-rt7.tar.xz

spin_trylock_irqsave() has a __cond_lock() wrapper which points to
__spin_trylock_irqsave(). The function then invokes spin_trylock() which
has another __cond_lock() finally pointing to rt_spin_trylock().

The compiler has no problem to parse this but sparse does not recognise
that users of spin_trylock_irqsave() acquire a conditional lock and
complains.

Remove one layer of __cond_lock() so that sparse recognises conditional
locking.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812104200.2239232-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/spinlock_rt.h |    5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static __always_inline void spin_unlock_
 #define spin_trylock_irq(lock)				\
 	__cond_lock(lock, rt_spin_trylock(lock))
 
-#define __spin_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags)		\
+#define spin_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags)		\
 ({							\
 	int __locked;					\
 							\
@@ -142,9 +142,6 @@ static __always_inline void spin_unlock_
 	__locked;					\
 })
 
-#define spin_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags)		\
-	__cond_lock(lock, __spin_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags))
-
 #define spin_is_contended(lock)		(((void)(lock), 0))
 
 static inline int spin_is_locked(spinlock_t *lock)
